View Old View New View Both View Only Previous Next

This draft contains only sections that have differences from the version that it modified.

W3C

XPath and XQuery Functions and Operators 4.0

W3C Editor's Draft 23 February 2026

This version:
https://qt4cg.org/specifications/xpath-functions-40/
Latest version of XPath and XQuery Functions and Operators 4.0:
https://qt4cg.org/specifications/xpath-functions-40/
Most recent Recommendation of XPath and XQuery Functions and Operators:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-xpath-functions-31-20170321/
Editor:
Michael Kay, Saxonica <http://www.saxonica.com/>

Please check the errata for any errors or issues reported since publication.

See also translations.

This document is also available in these non-normative formats: Specification in XML format and XML function catalog.

Copyright © 2000 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio, Beihang). W3C liability, trademark and document use rules apply.

Abstract

This document defines constructor functions, operators, and functions on the datatypes defined in [XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition] and the datatypes defined in [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 3.1]. It also defines functions and operators on nodes and node sequences as defined in the [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 3.1]. These functions and operators are defined for use in [XML Path Language (XPath) 4.0] and [XQuery 4.0: An XML Query Language] and [XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 4.0] and other related XML standards. The signatures and summaries of functions defined in this document are available at: http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/.

A summary of changes since version 3.1 is provided at H Changes since 3.1.

Status of this Document

This version of the specification is work in progress. It is produced by the QT4 Working Group, officially the W3C XSLT 4.0 Extensions Community Group. Individual functions specified in the document may be at different stages of review, reflected in their History notes. Comments are invited, in the form of GitHub issues at https://github.com/qt4cg/qtspecs.

Dedication

The publications of this community group are dedicated to our co-chair, Michael Sperberg-McQueen (1954–2024).

17 External resources and data formats

These functions in this section access resources external to a query or stylesheet, and convert between external file formats and their XPath and XQuery data model representation.

17.3 Functions on HTML Data

Changes in 4.0 ⬇ ⬆

  1. A new function is available for processing input data in HTML format.   [Issues 74 850 1799 1889 1891 PRs 259 956 10 January 2023]

This function converts between the lexical representation of HTML and the XDM tree representation.

FunctionMeaning
fn:parse-htmlThis function takes as input an HTML document, and returns the document node at the root of an XDM tree representing the parsed document.
fn:html-docReads an external resource containing HTML, and returns the result of parsing the resource as HTML.

17.3.1 XDM Mapping from HTML DOM Nodes

The fn:parse-html function conceptually works in two phases:

  1. The lexical HTML (supplied as a string) is parsed into an HTML DOM as defined by the HTML5 specification: see [HTML: Living Standard] and [DOM: Living Standard].

  2. The resulting DOM is converted to an XDM tree as described in this section. This is described by defining the actions of the accessor functions defined in [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.5 Accessors.

Note:

Because the [DOM: Living Standard] and [HTML: Living Standard] are not fixed, it is implementation-defined which versions are used.

Note:

An implementation must match the semantics of the mapping described in this section, but the specific way it achieves that is implementation-dependent.

Some possible implementation strategies are:

  1. Parse the HTML to an HTML DOM and then convert the HTML DOM to an XDM node tree.

  2. Parse the HTML to an HTML DOM and then implement a wrapper or facade that presents an XDM interface to the HTML DOM.

  3. Parse the lexical HTML directly to an XDM node tree, bypassing the HTML DOM.

The [DOM: Living Standard] defines parsing algorithms for two different formats, which it refers to as the HTML and XML serializations (or concrete syntaxes). The XML serialization is an XML document which typically uses the namespace http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml and the content type application/xhtml+xml, and is popularly referred to as XHTML. The HTML parsing algorithm constructs an HTML DOM HTMLDocument document object for the HTML document. The XHTML parsing algorithm constructs an HTML DOM XMLDocument object for the HTML document, following XML parsing rules. This mapping supports both of these document types.

The [DOM: Living Standard] specification defines HTML DOM nodes that are mapped to XDM nodes as follows:

  1. The HTML DOM Document interface maps to [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.4.1 Document nodes.

  2. The HTML DOM Element interface maps to [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.4.2 Element nodes. But see below for the mapping of an HTML template element.

  3. The HTML DOM Attr interface maps to [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.4.3 Attribute nodes.

    Note:

    Any HTML DOM Attr instances in an HTML DOM HTMLDocument that represent namespace declarations will have been filtered out: see 17.3.1.1 attributes Accessor.

  4. The HTML DOM ProcessingInstruction interface maps to [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.4.5 Processing instruction nodes.

    Note:

    The HTML parsing algorithm does not generate processing instruction nodes. If encountered they are parsed as comment nodes. The HTML DOM ProcessingInstruction interface is relevant only when the XHTML parsing algorithm is used.

  5. The HTML DOM Comment interface maps to [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.4.6 Comment nodes.

  6. The HTML DOM Text interface maps to [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.4.7 Text nodes. Adjacent HTML DOM Text nodes are combined into a single [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.4.7 Text nodes.

    Note:

    The HTML DOM CDATASection interface is an instance of HTML DOM Text, so CDATA sections also map to [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.4.7 Text nodes.

    The use of CDATA sections can result in the HTML DOM containing adjacent text nodes, which the mapping to XDM will merge into a single node.

  7. An HTML template element is mapped to an XDM template element with children corresponding to the children of the HTML DOM DocumentFragment that is the value of the template contents property of the HTML DOM template element.

    Note:

    Given source HTML such as <template><p>Lorem ipsum</p></template>, the HTML DOM represents the element <p>Lorem ipsum</p> not as a child of the template element, but as the child of a free-standing document fragment which is accessible (in the DOM API) as the value of the template.content property of the element node. The XDM representation produced by the parse-html does not follow this convention: instead, the element <p>Lorem ipsum</p> appears as an ordinary child node of the template element.

Note:

The HTML DOM DocumentFragment interface is not supported as an XML node. There are two places in the HTML DOM where this is used:

  1. The HTML DOM ShadowRoot interface is not present in the main HTML DOM tree. It is only accessible via JavaScript.

  2. The template element’s content property contains the child nodes of the template element. The behaviour of this is defined by the described aboveinclude-template-content key in the $options map.

If an implementation allows these nodes to be passed in via an API or similar mechanism, their behaviour is implementation-defined.

17.3.1.3 children Accessor

The result of the [XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 4.0] section 7.5.3 children Accessordm:children($node) for an HTML DOM Node is as follows:

  1. If the node is an instance of HTML DOM Document then the result is the value of the Node.childNodes property mapped to a sequence;

  2. If the node is an instance of HTML DOM HTMLTemplateElement then the result is determined as followsthe HTML DOM DocumentFragment:’s Node.childNodes property, mapped to a sequence;

    1. If the include-template-content key of the parse-html-options map is false(), the result is an empty sequence;

    2. Select the HTML DOM DocumentFragment from the HTMLTemplateElement.content property;

    3. The HTML DOM DocumentFragment’s Node.childNodes property is mapped to a sequence;

  3. If the node is an instance of HTML DOM Element then the result the value of the Node.childNodes property mapped to a sequence;

  4. Otherwise, the result is an empty sequence.

An HTML DOM NodeList is mapped to a sequence as follows:

  1. NodeList.length is the length of the sequence, where a length of 0 results in an empty sequence;

  2. NodeList.item(n) is the nth element of the sequence.

That sequence is then filtered as follows:

  1. If the child is an instance of HTML DOM DocumentType, that child is not included in this sequence;

  2. A sequence of consecutive HTML DOM Text nodes is combined into a single XDM text node;

  3. Otherwise, the HTML DOM Node nodes are mapped to XDM according to the rules in this section.

17.3.2 fn:parse-html

Changes in 4.0 ⬇ ⬆

  1. New in 4.0  [Issues 74 850 1799 1889 1891 2210 PRs 259 956 10 January 2023]

Summary

This function takes as input an HTML document, and returns the document node at the root of an XDM tree representing the parsed document.

Signature
fn:parse-html(
$valueas (xs:string | xs:hexBinary | xs:base64Binary)?,
$optionsas map(*)?:= {}
) as document-node(*:html)?
Properties

This function is nondeterministic, context-independent, and focus-independent.

Rules

If $value is the empty sequence the function returns the empty sequence.

In other cases, $value is expected to contain an HTML document supplied either as a string or a binary value.

The entries that may appear in the $options map are as follows:

record(
encoding?as xs:string,
fail-on-error?as xs:boolean,
include-template-content?as xs:boolean
)
KeyValueMeaning

encoding?

The character encoding to use to decode a sequence of octets that represents an HTML document.

  • Type: xs:string

fail-on-error?

Indicates whether the function should fail with a dynamic error if the input is not syntactically valid.

  • Type: xs:boolean

  • Default: false()

false Parsing errors should be handled as described in [HTML: Living Standard] section 13.2.2, Parse Errors.
true A parsing error should result in the function failing with a dynamic error.

include-template-content?

Defines how to handle elements in the HTMLTemplateElement.content property.

If this option is true, the template element’s children are the children of the content property’s document fragment node.

If this option is false, the template element’s children are the empty sequence.

The default behaviour is implementation-defined.

Note:

This allows an implementation to support the behaviour defined in [HTML: Living Standard] section 4.12.3.1, Interaction of template elements with XSLT and XPath:

  1. This option would default to true for an XSLT processor operating on an HTML DOM constructed from an XHTML document.

  2. This option would default to false for an XPath processor using the [DOM: Living Standard] section 8, XPath APIs.

  • Type: xs:boolean

The option parameter conventions apply.

If $value is not the empty sequence, an input byte stream is constructed as follows:

  1. If $value is an xs:string, then in principle no decoding is needed. Conceptually, however, the HTML parsing algorithm always starts by decoding an octet stream. The string is therefore first encoded using UTF-8, and the resulting octet stream is then passed to the HTML parser with a known definite encoding of UTF-8, as described in [HTML: Living Standard] section 13.2.3.1, Parsing with a known character encoding.

    If the first codepoint of the string is U+FEFF, this should be stripped, since it might otherwise lead to an incorrect encoding inference.

  2. If the type of $value is a sequence of octets (xs:hexBinary or xs:base64Binary) the encoding of the input byte stream is determined in a way consistent with [HTML: Living Standard] section 13.2.3.2, Determining the character encoding:

    1. The encoding key of $options is interpreted in step 2 of Determining the character encoding as the user instructing the user agent to override the document’s character encoding with the specified encoding.

    2. If the encoding key of $options is not specified, step 2 of Determining the character encoding is skipped.

The resulting byte stream is then used to construct an XDM representation of the HTML document in a way that is equivalent to:

  1. Tokenizing the byte stream according to the HTML parsing algorithm as described in [HTML: Living Standard] section 13.2.5, Tokenization.

  2. Constructing a HTMLDocument object for HTML documents, or an XMLDocument for XML/XHTML documents as described in [HTML: Living Standard] section 13.2.6, Tree construction.

  3. Building an XDM representation of the HTMLDocument or XMLDocument according to the rules in 17.3.1 XDM Mapping from HTML DOM Nodes.

The implementation should process any input HTML that adheres to the current practice of mainstream web browsers, as this evolves over time. Since this is defined by a “living standard” (see [HTML: Living Standard]), no specific version is prescribed. An implementation may define additional options to control aspects of the HTML parsing algorithm, including the selection of a specific HTML parsing library; it may also provide options to process alternative HTML versions or dialects.

The implementation should recognize and process XHTML (referred to in [HTML: Living Standard] as the XML concrete syntax of HTML).

The function is nondeterministic with respect to node identity: that is, if the function is called twice with the same arguments, it is implementation-dependent whether the same node is returned on both occasions.

Error Conditions

A dynamic error is raised [err:FODC0011] if the content of $value is not a well-formed HTML document.

Notes

If the HTML parser accepts a string as the input then that may be used directly when $value is an xs:string instead of converting the string to a sequence of octets in an implementation-dependent encoding. The HTML parser must not perform character encoding processing on that input, treating the HTML string as being in a known character encoding that matches the encoding of the string.

The WHATWG Encoding specification defines the ISO 8859-1 (latin1) and ASCII encodings as aliases of the windows-1252 encoding.

Examples

The expression parse-html(()) returns ().

The expression parse-html("<p>Hello</p>") returns an XDM document node equivalent to the result of parsing the XML <html xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><head/><body><p>Hello</p></body></html>

The expression parse-html("<p>Hi</p>", method:="html") is equivalent to parse-html("<p>Hi</p>").

G Implementation-defined features (Non-Normative)

  1. It is implementation-defined which version of Unicode is supported, but it is recommended that the most recent version of Unicode be used. (See Conformance.)

  2. It is implementation-defined whether the type system is based on XML Schema 1.0 or XML Schema 1.1. (See Conformance.)

  3. It is implementation-defined whether definitions that rely on XML (for example, the set of valid XML characters) should use the definitions in XML 1.0 or XML 1.1. (See Conformance.)

  4. Implementations may attach an implementation-defined meaning to options in the map that are not described in this specification. These options should use values of type xs:QName as the option names, using an appropriate namespace. (See Options.)

  5. It is implementation-defined which version of [The Unicode Standard] is supported, but it is recommended that the most recent version of Unicode be used. (See Strings, characters, and codepoints.)

  6. [Definition] Some functions (such as fn:distinct-values, fn:unordered, map:keys, and map:for-each) produce results in an implementation-defined or implementation-dependent order. In such cases two calls with the same arguments are not guaranteed to produce the results in the same order. These functions are said to be nondeterministic with respect to ordering. (See Properties of functions.)

  7. Where the results of a function are described as being (to a greater or lesser extent) implementation-defined or implementation-dependent, this does not by itself remove the requirement that the results should be deterministic: that is, that repeated calls with the same explicit and implicit arguments must return identical results. (See Properties of functions.)

  8. They may provide an implementation-defined mechanism that allows users to choose between raising an error and returning a result that is modulo the largest representable integer value. See [ISO 10967]. (See Arithmetic operators on numeric values.)

  9. For xs:decimal values, let N be the number of digits of precision supported by the implementation, and let M (M <= N) be the minimum limit on the number of digits required for conformance (18 digits for XSD 1.0, 16 digits for XSD 1.1). Then for addition, subtraction, and multiplication operations, the returned result should be accurate to N digits of precision, and for division and modulus operations, the returned result should be accurate to at least M digits of precision. The actual precision is implementation-defined. If the number of digits in the mathematical result exceeds the number of digits that the implementation retains for that operation, the result is truncated or rounded in an implementation-defined manner. (See Arithmetic operators on numeric values.)

  10. The [IEEE 754-2019] specification also describes handling of two exception conditions called divideByZero and invalidOperation. The IEEE divideByZero exception is raised not only by a direct attempt to divide by zero, but also by operations such as log(0). The IEEE invalidOperation exception is raised by attempts to call a function with an argument that is outside the function’s domain (for example, sqrt(-1) or log(-1)). Although IEEE defines these as exceptions, it also defines “default non-stop exception handling” in which the operation returns a defined result, typically positive or negative infinity, or NaN. With this function library, these IEEE exceptions do not cause a dynamic error at the application level; rather they result in the relevant function or operator returning the defined non-error result. The underlying IEEE exception may be notified to the application or to the user by some implementation-defined warning condition, but the observable effect on an application using the functions and operators defined in this specification is simply to return the defined result (typically -INF, +INF, or NaN) with no error. (See Arithmetic operators on numeric values.)

  11. The [IEEE 754-2019] specification distinguishes two NaN values: a quiet NaN and a signaling NaN. These two values are not distinguishable in the XDM model: the value spaces of xs:float and xs:double each include only a single NaN value. This does not prevent the implementation distinguishing them internally, and triggering different implementation-defined warning conditions, but such distinctions do not affect the observable behavior of an application using the functions and operators defined in this specification. (See Arithmetic operators on numeric values.)

  12. The implementation may adopt a different algorithm provided that it is equivalent to this formulation in all cases where implementation-dependent or implementation-defined behavior does not affect the outcome, for example, the implementation-defined precision of the result of xs:decimal division. (See op:numeric-integer-divide.)

  13. There may be implementation-defined limits on the precision available. If the requested $precision is outside this range, it should be adjusted to the nearest value supported by the implementation. (See fn:divide-decimals.)

  14. There may be implementation-defined limits on the precision available. If the requested $precision is outside this range, it should be adjusted to the nearest value supported by the implementation. (See fn:round.)

  15. There may be implementation-defined limits on the precision available. If the requested $precision is outside this range, it should be adjusted to the nearest value supported by the implementation. (See fn:round-half-to-even.)

  16. XSD 1.1 allows the string +INF as a representation of positive infinity; XSD 1.0 does not. It is implementation-defined whether XSD 1.1 is supported. (See fn:number.)

  17. Any other format token, which indicates a numbering sequence in which that token represents the number 1 (one) (but see the note below). It is implementation-defined which numbering sequences, additional to those listed above, are supported. If an implementation does not support a numbering sequence represented by the given token, it must use a format token of 1. (See fn:format-integer.)

  18. For all format tokens other than a digit-pattern, there may be implementation-defined lower and upper bounds on the range of numbers that can be formatted using this format token; indeed, for some numbering sequences there may be intrinsic limits. For example, the format token U+2460 (CIRCLED DIGIT ONE, ①) has a range imposed by the Unicode character repertoire — zero to 20 in Unicode versions prior to 3.2, or zero to 50 in subsequent versions. For the numbering sequences described above any upper bound imposed by the implementation must not be less than 1000 (one thousand) and any lower bound must not be greater than 1. Numbers that fall outside this range must be formatted using the format token 1. (See fn:format-integer.)

  19. The set of languages for which numbering is supported is implementation-defined. If the $language argument is absent, or is set to an empty sequence, or is invalid, or is not a language supported by the implementation, then the number is formatted using the default language from the dynamic context. (See fn:format-integer.)

  20. ...either a or t, to indicate alphabetic or traditional numbering respectively, the default being implementation-defined. (See fn:format-integer.)

  21. The string of characters between the parentheses, if present, is used to select between other possible variations of cardinal or ordinal numbering sequences. The interpretation of this string is implementation-defined. No error occurs if the implementation does not define any interpretation for the defined string. (See fn:format-integer.)

  22. It is implementation-defined what combinations of values of the format token, the language, and the cardinal/ordinal modifier are supported. If ordinal numbering is not supported for the combination of the format token, the language, and the string appearing in parentheses, the request is ignored and cardinal numbers are generated instead. (See fn:format-integer.)

  23. The use of the a or t modifier disambiguates between numbering sequences that use letters. In many languages there are two commonly used numbering sequences that use letters. One numbering sequence assigns numeric values to letters in alphabetic sequence, and the other assigns numeric values to each letter in some other manner traditional in that language. In English, these would correspond to the numbering sequences specified by the format tokens a and i. In some languages, the first member of each sequence is the same, and so the format token alone would be ambiguous. In the absence of the a or t modifier, the default is implementation-defined. (See fn:format-integer.)

  24. The static context provides a set of decimal formats. One of the decimal formats is unnamed, the others (if any) are identified by a QName. There is always an unnamed decimal format available, but its contents are implementation-defined. (See Defining a decimal format.)

  25. IEEE states that the preferred quantum is language-defined. In this specification, it is implementation-defined. (See Trigonometric and exponential functions.)

  26. IEEE defines various rounding algorithms for inexact results, and states that the choice of rounding direction, and the mechanisms for influencing this choice, are language-defined. In this specification, the rounding direction and any mechanisms for influencing it are implementation-defined. (See Trigonometric and exponential functions.)

  27. The map returned by the fn:random-number-generator function may contain additional entries beyond those specified here, but it must match the record type defined above. The meaning of any additional entries is implementation-defined. To avoid conflict with any future version of this specification, the keys of any such entries should start with an underscore character. (See fn:random-number-generator.)

  28. It is no longer automatically an error if the input contains a codepoint that is not valid in XML. Instead, the codepoint must be a permitted character. The set of permitted characters is implementation-defined, but it is recommended that all Unicode characters should be accepted. (See fn:codepoints-to-string.)

  29. If two query parameters use the same keyword then the last one wins. If a query parameter uses a keyword or value which is not defined in this specification then the meaning is implementation-defined. If the implementation recognizes the meaning of the keyword and value then it should interpret it accordingly; if it does not recognize the keyword or value then if the fallback parameter is present with the value no it should reject the collation as unsupported, otherwise it should ignore the unrecognized parameter. (See The Unicode Collation Algorithm.)

  30. The following query parameters are defined. If any parameter is absent, the default is implementation-defined except where otherwise stated. The meaning given for each parameter is non-normative; the normative specification is found in [UTS #35]. (See The Unicode Collation Algorithm.)

  31. Because the set of collations that are supported is implementation-defined, an implementation has the option to support all collation URIs, in which case it will never raise this error. (See Choosing a collation.)

  32. The properties available are as defined for the Unicode Collation Algorithm (see 5.3.4 The Unicode Collation Algorithm). Additional implementation-defined properties may be specified as described in the rules for UCA collation URIs. (See fn:collation.)

  33. It is possible to define collations that do not have the ability to generate collation keys. Supplying such a collation will cause the function to fail. The ability to generate collation keys is an implementation-defined property of the collation. (See fn:collation-key.)

  34. Conforming implementations must support normalization form NFC and may support normalization forms NFD, NFKC, NFKD, and FULLY-NORMALIZED. They may also support other normalization forms with implementation-defined semantics. (See fn:normalize-unicode.)

  35. It is implementation-defined which version of Unicode (and therefore, of the normalization algorithms and their underlying data) is supported by the implementation. See [UAX #15] for details of the stability policy regarding changes to the normalization rules in future versions of Unicode. If the input string contains codepoints that are unassigned in the relevant version of Unicode, or for which no normalization rules are defined, the fn:normalize-unicode function leaves such codepoints unchanged. If the implementation supports the requested normalization form then it must be able to handle every input string without raising an error. (See fn:normalize-unicode.)

  36. It is possible to define collations that do not have the ability to decompose a string into units suitable for substring matching. An argument to a function defined in this section may be a URI that identifies a collation that is able to compare two strings, but that does not have the capability to split the string into collation units. Such a collation may cause the function to fail, or to give unexpected results, or it may be rejected as an unsuitable argument. The ability to decompose strings into collation units is an implementation-defined property of the collation. The fn:collation-available function can be used to ask whether a particular collation has this property. (See Functions based on substring matching.)

  37. The result of the function will always be such that validation against this schema would succeed. However, it is implementation-defined whether the result is typed or untyped, that is, whether the elements and attributes in the returned tree have type annotations that reflect the result of validating against this schema. (See fn:analyze-string.)

  38. Some URI schemes are hierarchical and some are non-hierarchical. Implementations must treat the following schemes as non-hierarchical: jar, mailto, news, tag, tel, and urn. Whether additional schemes are known to be non-hierarchical implementation-defined. If a scheme is not known to be non-hierarchical, it must be treated as hierarchical. (See Parsing and building URIs.)

  39. If the omit-default-ports option is true, the port is discarded and set to the empty sequence if the port number is the same as the default port for the given scheme. Implementations should recognize the default ports for http (80), https (443), ftp (21), and ssh (22). Exactly which ports are recognized is implementation-defined. (See fn:parse-uri.)

  40. If the omit-default-ports option is true then the $port is set to the empty sequence if the port number is the same as the default port for the given scheme. Implementations should recognize the default ports for http (80), https (443), ftp (21), and ssh (22). Exactly which ports are recognized is implementation-defined. (See fn:build-uri.)

  41. Processors may support a greater range and/or precision. The limits are implementation-defined. (See Limits and precision.)

  42. Similarly, a processor may be unable accurately to represent the result of dividing a duration by 2, or multiplying a duration by 0.5. A processor that limits the precision of the seconds component of duration values must deliver a result that is as close as possible to the mathematically precise result, given these limits; if two values are equally close, the one that is chosen is implementation-defined. (See Limits and precision.)

  43. All conforming processors must support year values in the range 1 to 9999, and a minimum fractional second precision of 1 millisecond or three digits (i.e., s.sss). However, processors may set larger implementation-defined limits on the maximum number of digits they support in these two situations. Processors may also choose to support the year 0 and years with negative values. The results of operations on dates that cross the year 0 are implementation-defined. (See Limits and precision.)

  44. Similarly, a processor that limits the precision of the seconds component of date and time or duration values may need to deliver a rounded result for arithmetic operations. Such a processor must deliver a result that is as close as possible to the mathematically precise result, given these limits: if two values are equally close, the one that is chosen is implementation-defined. (See Limits and precision.)

  45. ...the format token n, N, or Nn, indicating that the value of the component is to be output by name, in lower-case, upper-case, or title-case respectively. Components that can be output by name include (but are not limited to) months, days of the week, timezones, and eras. If the processor cannot output these components by name for the chosen calendar and language then it must use an implementation-defined fallback representation. (See The picture string.)

  46. ...indicates alphabetic or traditional numbering respectively, the default being implementation-defined. This has the same meaning as in the second argument of fn:format-integer. (See The picture string.)

  47. The sequence of characters in the (adjusted) first presentation modifier is reversed (for example, 999'### becomes ###'999). If the result is not a valid decimal digit pattern, then the output is implementation-defined. (See Formatting Fractional Seconds.)

  48. The output for these components is entirely implementation-defined. The default presentation modifier for these components is n, indicating that they are output as names (or conventional abbreviations), and the chosen names will in many cases depend on the chosen language: see 9.8.4.8 The language, calendar, and place arguments. (See Formatting Other Components.)

  49. The set of languages, calendars, and places that are supported in the date formatting functions is implementation-defined. When any of these arguments is omitted or is an empty sequence, an implementation-defined default value is used. (See The language, calendar, and place arguments.)

  50. The choice of the names and abbreviations used in any given language is implementation-defined. For example, one implementation might abbreviate July as Jul while another uses Jly. In German, one implementation might represent Saturday as Samstag while another uses Sonnabend. Implementations may provide mechanisms allowing users to control such choices. (See The language, calendar, and place arguments.)

  51. The choice of the names and abbreviations used in any given language for calendar units such as days of the week and months of the year is implementation-defined. (See The language, calendar, and place arguments.)

  52. The calendar value if present must be a valid EQName (dynamic error: [err:FOFD1340]). If it is a lexical QName then it is expanded into an expanded QName using the statically known namespaces; if it has no prefix then it represents an expanded-QName in no namespace. If the expanded QName is in no namespace, then it must identify a calendar with a designator specified below (dynamic error: [err:FOFD1340]). If the expanded QName is in a namespace then it identifies the calendar in an implementation-defined way. (See The language, calendar, and place arguments.)

  53. At least one of the above calendars must be supported. It is implementation-defined which calendars are supported. (See The language, calendar, and place arguments.)

  54. If the arguments to fn:function-lookup identify a function that is present in the static context of the function call, the function will always return the same function that a static reference to this function would bind to. If there is no such function in the static context, then the results depend on what is present in the dynamic context, which is implementation-defined. (See fn:function-lookup.)

  55. It is to some extent implementation-defined whether two maps or arrays have the same function identity. Processors should ensure as a minimum that when a variable $m is bound to a map or array, calling jtree($m) more than once (with the same variable reference) will deliver the same JNode each time. (See fn:jtree.)

  56. The requirement to deliver a deterministic result has performance implications, and for this reason implementations may provide a user option to evaluate the function without a guarantee of determinism. The manner in which any such option is provided is implementation-defined. If the user has not selected such an option, a call of the function must either return a deterministic result or must raise a dynamic error [err:FODC0003]. (See fn:doc.)

  57. Various aspects of this processing are implementation-defined. Implementations may provide external configuration options that allow any aspect of the processing to be controlled by the user. In particular:... (See fn:doc.)

  58. It is implementation-defined whether DTD validation and/or schema validation is applied to the source document. (See fn:doc.)

  59. The effect of a fragment identifier in the supplied URI is implementation-defined. One possible interpretation is to treat the fragment identifier as an ID attribute value, and to return a document node having the element with the selected ID value as its only child. (See fn:doc.)

  60. By default, this function is deterministic. This means that repeated calls on the function with the same argument will return the same result. However, for performance reasons, implementations may provide a user option to evaluate the function without a guarantee of determinism. The manner in which any such option is provided is implementation-defined. If the user has not selected such an option, a call to this function must either return a deterministic result or must raise a dynamic error [err:FODC0003]. (See fn:collection.)

  61. By default, this function is deterministic. This means that repeated calls on the function with the same argument will return the same result. However, for performance reasons, implementations may provide a user option to evaluate the function without a guarantee of determinism. The manner in which any such option is provided is implementation-defined. If the user has not selected such an option, a call to this function must either return a deterministic result or must raise a dynamic error [err:FODC0003]. (See fn:uri-collection.)

  62. It is no longer automatically an error if the resource (after decoding) contains a codepoint that is not valid in XML. Instead, the codepoint must be a permitted character. The set of permitted characters is implementation-defined, but it is recommended that all Unicode characters should be accepted. (See fn:unparsed-text.)

  63. The processor may use implementation-defined heuristics to determine the likely encoding. (See fn:unparsed-text.)

  64. The fact that the resolution of URIs is defined by a mapping in the dynamic context means that in effect, various aspects of the behavior of this function are implementation-defined. Implementations may provide external configuration options that allow any aspect of the processing to be controlled by the user. In particular:... (See fn:unparsed-text.)

  65. The fact that the resolution of URIs is defined by a mapping in the dynamic context means that in effect, various aspects of the behavior of this function are implementation-defined. Implementations may provide external configuration options that allow any aspect of the processing to be controlled by the user. In particular:... (See fn:unparsed-binary.)

  66. The collation used for matching names is implementation-defined, but must be the same as the collation used to ensure that the names of all environment variables are unique. (See fn:environment-variable.)

  67. Except to the extent defined by these options, the precise process used to construct the XDM instance is implementation-defined. In particular, it is implementation-defined whether an XML 1.0 or XML 1.1 parser is used. (See fn:parse-xml.)

  68. Options set in $options may be supplemented or modified based on configuration options defined externally using implementation-defined mechanisms. (See fn:parse-xml.)

  69. Except as explicitly defined, the precise process used to construct the XDM instance is implementation-defined. In particular, it is implementation-defined whether an XML 1.0 or XML 1.1 parser is used. (See fn:parse-xml-fragment.)

  70. If the second argument is omitted, or is supplied in the form of an output:serialization-parameters element, then the values of any serialization parameters that are not explicitly specified is implementation-defined, and may depend on the context. (See fn:serialize.)

  71. A list of target namespaces identifying schema components to be used for validation. The way in which the processor locates schema components for the specified target namespaces is implementation-defined. A zero-length string denotes a no-namespace schema.... (See fn:xsd-validator.)

  72. Set to the decimal value 1.0 or 1.1 to indicate which version of XSD is to be used. The default is implementation-defined. A processor may use a later version of XSD than the version requested, but must not use an earlier version.... (See fn:xsd-validator.)

  73. The XSD specification allows a schema to be used for validation even when it contains unresolved references to absent schema components. It is implementation-defined whether this function allows the schema to be incomplete in this way. For example, some processors might allow validation using a schema in which an element declaration contains a reference to a type declaration that is not present in the schema, provided that the element declaration is never needed in the course of a particular validation episodes. (See fn:xsd-validator.)

  74. ...error-details as map(*)*. This field is present only when (a) the option return-error-details was set to true, and (b) the supplied document was found to be invalid. The value is a sequence of maps, each containing details of one invalidity that was found. The precise details of the invalidities are implementation-defined, but they may include the following fields, if the information is available:... (See fn:xsd-validator.)

  75. Because the [DOM: Living Standard] and [HTML: Living Standard] are not fixed, it is implementation-defined which versions are used. (See XDM Mapping from HTML DOM Nodes.)

  76. If an implementation allows these nodes to be passed in via an API or similar mechanism, their behaviour is implementation-defined. (See XDM Mapping from HTML DOM Nodes.)

  77. If the local name contains a character that is not a valid XML NameStartChar or NameChar, then an implementation-defined replacement string is used. The result must be a valid NCName. (See node-name Accessor.)

  78. If the local name contains a character that is not a valid XML NameStartChar or NameChar, then an implementation-defined replacement string is used. The result must be a valid NCName. (See node-name Accessor.)

  79. The default behaviour is implementation-defined. (See fn:parse-html.)

  80. The input may contain deviations from the grammar of [RFC 7159], which are handled in an implementation-defined way. (Note: some popular extensions include allowing quotes on keys to be omitted, allowing a comma to appear after the last item in an array, allowing leading zeroes in numbers, and allowing control characters such as tab and newline to be present in unescaped form.) Since the extensions accepted are implementation-defined, an error may be raised [err:FOJS0001] if the input does not conform to the grammar. (See fn:parse-json.)

  81. The supplied function is called to process the string value of any JSON number in the input. By default, numbers are processed by converting to xs:double using the XPath casting rules. Supplying the value xs:decimal#1 will instead convert to xs:decimal (which potentially retains more precision, but disallows exponential notation), while supplying a function that casts to (xs:decimal | xs:double) will treat the value as xs:decimal if there is no exponent, or as xs:double otherwise. Supplying the value fn:identity#1 causes the value to be retained unchanged as an xs:untypedAtomic. If the liberal option is false (the default), then the supplied number-parser is called if and only if the value conforms to the JSON grammar for numbers (for example, a leading plus sign and redundant leading zeroes are not allowed). If the liberal option is true then it is also called if the value conforms to an implementation-defined extension of this grammar. (See fn:parse-json.)

  82. It is no longer automatically an error if the input contains a codepoint that is not valid in XML. Instead, the codepoint must be a permitted character. The set of permitted characters is implementation-defined, but it is recommended that all Unicode characters should be accepted. (See fn:json-doc.)

  83. The input may contain deviations from the grammar of [RFC 7159], which are handled in an implementation-defined way. (Note: some popular extensions include allowing quotes on keys to be omitted, allowing a comma to appear after the last item in an array, allowing leading zeroes in numbers, and allowing control characters such as tab and newline to be present in unescaped form.) Since the extensions accepted are implementation-defined, an error may be raised (see below) if the input does not conform to the grammar. (See fn:json-to-xml.)

  84. Default: Implementation-defined. (See fn:json-to-xml.)

  85. Indicates that the resulting XDM instance must be typed; that is, the element and attribute nodes must carry the type annotations that result from validation against the schema given at D.2 Schema for the result of fn:json-to-xml, or against an implementation-defined schema if the liberal option has the value true. (See fn:json-to-xml.)

  86. The result of the function will always be such that validation against this schema would succeed. However, it is implementation-defined whether the result is typed or untyped, that is, whether the elements and attributes in the returned tree have type annotations that reflect the result of validating against this schema. (See fn:csv-to-xml.)

  87. Additional, implementation-defined options may be available, for example, to control aspects of the XML serialization, to specify the grammar start symbol, or to produce output formats other than XML. (See fn:invisible-xml.)

  88. Default: The version given in the prolog of the library module; or implementation-defined if this is absent. (See fn:load-xquery-module.)

  89. A sequence of URIs (in the form of xs:string values) which may be used or ignored in an implementation-defined way.... (See fn:load-xquery-module.)

  90. Values for vendor-defined configuration options for the XQuery processor used to process the request. The key is the name of an option, expressed as a QName: the namespace URI of the QName should be a URI controlled by the vendor of the XQuery processor. The meaning of the associated value is implementation-defined. Implementations should ignore options whose names are in an unrecognized namespace. The option parameter conventions do not apply to this contained map.... (See fn:load-xquery-module.)

  91. It is implementation-defined whether constructs in the library module are evaluated in the same execution scope as the calling module. (See fn:load-xquery-module.)

  92. The library module that is loaded may import schema declarations using an import schema declaration. It is implementation-defined whether schema components in the in-scope schema definitions of the calling module are automatically added to the in-scope schema definitions of the dynamically loaded module. The in-scope schema definitions of the calling and called modules must be consistent, according to the rules defined in 2.2.5 Consistency Constraints XQ31. (See fn:load-xquery-module.)

  93. Default: Implementation-defined. (See fn:transform.)

  94. Default: Implementation-defined. (See fn:transform.)

  95. If the implementation provides a way of writing or invoking functions with side-effects, this post-processing function might be used to save a copy of the result document to persistent storage. For example, if the implementation provides access to the EXPath File library [EXPath], then a serialized document might be written to filestore by calling the file:write function. Similar mechanisms might be used to issue an HTTP POST request that posts the result to an HTTP server, or to send the document to an email recipient. The semantics of calling functions with side-effects are entirely implementation-defined. (See fn:transform.)

  96. Calls to fn:transform can potentially have side-effects even in the absence of the post-processing option, because the XSLT specification allows a stylesheet to invoke extension functions that have side-effects. The semantics in this case are implementation-defined. (See fn:transform.)

  97. A string intended to be used as the static base URI of the principal stylesheet module. This value must be used if no other static base URI is available. If the supplied stylesheet already has a base URI (which will generally be the case if the stylesheet is supplied using stylesheet-node or stylesheet-location) then it is implementation-defined whether this parameter has any effect. If the value is a relative reference, it is resolved against the executable base URIXP of the fn:transform function call.... (See fn:transform.)

  98. Values for vendor-defined configuration options for the XSLT processor used to process the request. The key is the name of an option, expressed as a QName: the namespace URI of the QName should be a URI controlled by the vendor of the XSLT processor. The meaning of the associated value is implementation-defined. Implementations should ignore options whose names are in an unrecognized namespace. Default is an empty map.... (See fn:transform.)

  99. It is implementation-defined whether the XSLT transformation is executed within the same execution scope as the calling code. (See fn:transform.)

  100. XSLT 1.0 does not define any error codes, so this is the likely outcome with an XSLT 1.0 processor. XSLT 2.0 and 3.0 do define error codes, but some APIs do not expose them. If multiple errors are signaled by the transformation (which is most likely to happen with static errors) then the error code should where possible be that of one of these errors, chosen arbitrarily; the processor may make details of additional errors available to the application in an implementation-defined way. (See fn:transform.)

  101. In addition, the values of $input, typically serialized and converted to an xs:string, and $label (if supplied and non-empty) may be output to an implementation-defined destination. (See fn:trace.)

  102. Consider a situation in which a user wants to investigate the actual value passed to a function. Assume that in a particular execution, $v is an xs:decimal with value 124.84. Writing fn:trace($v, 'the value of $v is:') will return $v. The processor may output "124.84" and "the value of $v is:" to an implementation-defined destination. (See fn:trace.)

  103. Similar to fn:trace, the values of $input, typically serialized and converted to an xs:string, and $label (if supplied and non-empty) may be output to an implementation-defined destination. (See fn:message.)

  104. If ST is xs:float or xs:double, then TV is the xs:decimal value, within the set of xs:decimal values that the implementation is capable of representing, that is numerically closest to SV. If two values are equally close, then the one that is closest to zero is chosen. If SV is too large to be accommodated as an xs:decimal, (see [XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition] for implementation-defined limits on numeric values) a dynamic error is raised [err:FOCA0001]. If SV is one of the special xs:float or xs:double values NaN, INF, or -INF, a dynamic error is raised [err:FOCA0002]. (See Casting to xs:decimal.)

  105. In casting to xs:decimal or to a type derived from xs:decimal, if the value is not too large or too small but nevertheless cannot be represented accurately with the number of decimal digits available to the implementation, the implementation may round to the nearest representable value or may raise a dynamic error [err:FOCA0006]. The choice of rounding algorithm and the choice between rounding and error behavior is implementation-defined. (See Casting from xs:string and xs:untypedAtomic.)

  106. If ST is xs:decimal, xs:float or xs:double, then TV is SV with the fractional part discarded and the value converted to xs:integer. Thus, casting 3.1456 returns 3 while -17.89 returns -17. Casting 3.124E1 returns 31. If SV is too large to be accommodated as an integer, (see [XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition] for implementation-defined limits on numeric values) a dynamic error is raised [err:FOCA0003]. If SV is one of the special xs:float or xs:double values NaN, INF, or -INF, a dynamic error is raised [err:FOCA0002]. (See Casting to xs:integer.)

  107. The tz timezone database, available at http://www.iana.org/time-zones. It is implementation-defined which version of the database is used. (See IANA Timezone Database.)

  108. Unicode Standard Annex #15: Unicode Normalization Forms. Ed. Mark Davis and Ken Whistler, Unicode Consortium. The current version is 16.0.0, dated 2024-08-14. As with [The Unicode Standard], the version to be used is implementation-defined. Available at: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/. (See UAX #15.)

  109. Unicode Standard Annex #29: Unicode Text Segmentation. Ed. Josh Hadley, Unicode Consortium. The current version is 16.0.0, dated 2024-08-28. As with [The Unicode Standard], the version to be used is implementation-defined. Available at: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/. (See UAX #29.)

  110. The Unicode Consortium, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2016. The Unicode Standard as updated from time to time by the publication of new versions. See http://www.unicode.org/standard/versions/ for the latest version and additional information on versions of the standard and of the Unicode Character Database. The version of Unicode to be used is implementation-defined, but implementations are recommended to use the latest Unicode version; currently, Version 9.0.0. (See The Unicode Standard.)

  111. Unicode Technical Standard #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm. Ed. Mark Davis and Ken Whistler, Unicode Consortium. The current version is 16.0.0, dated 2024-08-22. As with [The Unicode Standard], the version to be used is implementation-defined. Available at: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/. (See UTS #10.)

  112. Unicode Technical Standard #35: Unicode Locale Data Markup Language. Ed Mark Davis et al, Unicode Consortium. The current version is 47, dated 2025-03-11. As with [The Unicode Standard], the version to be used is implementation-defined. Available at: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/. (See UTS #35.)